Thursday, June 21, 2012

Supreme Court throws out TV cursing sanctions, TV Indecency Rules Were Too Vague

 Supreme Court throws out TV cursing sanctions
Updated at 2:52 pm ET (AP) WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously threw out fines and other penalties against broadcast companies that violated the Federal Communications Commission policy regulating curse words and nudity on television airwaves. But the justices declined to ...
+7

Pam Spaulding

3:13 PM  -  
Shared from +1
  -  Public
Supreme Court: TV Indecency Rules Were Too Vague »
The Supreme Court today, without dissent, ruled that that Federal Communications Commission (FCC) cannot fine Fox and ABC for two isolated utterances of “obscene” words and one instance of brief nudit...

Supreme Court throws out TV cursing sanctions

Cher is seen at the Billboard Music Awards in Las Vegas Dec. 9, 2002. (FOX/Getty Images)
Updated at 2:52 p.m. ET
(AP) WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously threw out fines and other penalties against broadcast companies that violated the Federal Communications Commission policy regulating curse words and nudity on television airwaves.
But the justices declined to issue a broad ruling on the constitutionality of the FCC's indecency policy. Instead, the court concluded only that broadcasters could not have known in advance that obscenities uttered during awards show programs and a brief display of nudity on an episode of ABC's "NYPD Blue" could give rise to penalties. ABC and 45 affiliates were hit with proposed fines totaling nearly $1.24 million.
The justices said the FCC is free to revise its indecency policy, which is intended to keep the airwaves free of objectionable material during the hours when children are likely to be watching.