TIME
Jun 28, 2012 - PublicTIME is releasing a special issue on the Supreme Court’s health care decision with the cover line,“Roberts Rules: What His Landmark Decision Means for Obama, Romney, the Court — And You.” This issue will hit newsstands on Monday, July 2. Read more about the issue here:http://ti.me/MZyN8v
(Photograph by Steve Pyke—Contour by Getty Images)
(Photograph by Steve Pyke—Contour by Getty Images)
▾
Craig MillerJun 28, 2012
thanks goodness some of the justices are operating
Outside of the politics. I was really impressed with
This decision
Outside of the politics. I was really impressed with
This decision
Aaron BerlinJun 28, 2012
To think that Senator Obama voted against Roberts when Bush nominated him!
Paul RumelhartJun 28, 2012
I don't like the precedent that has now been set that it is constitutional to tax somebody as a penalty for not doing something or even for not purchasing something. I can't see how that will be abused yet, but I'm sure it will be spectacular.
Francisco DonadoJun 28, 2012
It is preferable that millions of voices heard because they will always be frowned upon, as you will view the nation from which they come and not to intimidate and punish a voice to a society denying them their freedom. Francisco Donado ¡No to close Globovision.!
Craig MillerJun 28, 2012
not if he voted for corporate donations to political campaigns
That was a major screwup
They seem to have good days and bad days in my book
That was a major screwup
They seem to have good days and bad days in my book
rosie hecker von danzigJun 28, 2012
ok, so we're a legend from day one, i figure... scribble your name on some dotted line, and voila, a hero become. lame. fraud and lame.
Francisco DonadoJun 28, 2012
In Venezuela they are attacking free speech, you think?.#NoalembargocrontaGlobovision
david gelberJun 28, 2012
in 1984 orwell warned us about government control well here it is in all its glory
Jim ChatmanJun 28, 2012
I applaud the Chief Justice for putting political ideology aside and doing what he felt was best for the country.
Brian SmithJun 28, 2012
Roberts made a legacy decision. I think he doesn't believe in the health care law but didn't want his court to be labeled as partisan. He did the right thing for the wrong reason.
Aaron MeckJun 28, 2012
+Jim Chatman I hope he did not do it based on what he felt was best for the country but rather on an objective analysis of the law. He absolutely should not be making judgements based on his feelings.
Eddie LawsJun 28, 2012 (edited)
Federal judges are there to uphold the constituation of this country and nothing else. I am not worred about myself it is my grand kids I worry about. What type country will they grow up in.
Expand this comment »
Maurice WalsheJun 29, 2012
Nice reference for us wonks who love arguaing about the more arcane bits of Citrine or Roberts.
Of course teh USA should have had this sort of healthcare back in the early50's - but it got derailed unfortunetly
Of course teh USA should have had this sort of healthcare back in the early50's - but it got derailed unfortunetly
Greg FreemanJun 29, 2012
Good Morning good people and all that care to Listen, I have friends, well quite a few and some of these reside in america and are afflicted with HIV. Apparently these are decisive decisions that will change the face and facet of health care. I am looking forward with great interest to see where we are in ten years from now,
Nash PurohitJun 29, 2012
Nothing better than having a protected sex!! That does not need to wait for 10 yrs!! My common sense tells me that requires not to be victimized by you basic instincts !'
Expand this comment »
Aaron MeckYesterday 7:00 PM
+Jim Chatman that was nothing close to trolling... But please feels free to block me if you think I'm a troll.
