#Syria Iran’s Achilles’ Heel a strategic debacle for the Iranian government

Alexblx ‏@Alexblx

"#Iran has poured a vast array of resources into #Syria - as #Assadfalters - it is becoming #Iran’s Achilles’ heel"http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/08/opinion/to-weaken-iran-start-with-syria.html …

Collapse

•  Reply 
•  Retweet 
•  Favorite 
• Buffer
 
•  More

• 
  

• Iran’s Achilles’ Heel

  By EFRAIM HALEVY

  Published: February 7, 2012

  • RECOMMEND
  • TWITTER
  • LINKEDIN
  • SIGN IN TO E-MAIL
  • PRINT
  • REPRINTS
  • SHARE

  
  
  

  Jerusalem
  
  

  Related News

  • Stung by Criticism, Russia Sends Envoys to Syria to Defuse Crisis(February 8, 2012)

  • Times Topic: Syria — Protests (2011–)

  THE public debate in America and Israel these days is focused obsessively on whether to attack Iran in order to halt its nuclear weapons ambitions; hardly any attention is being paid to how events in Syria could result in a strategic debacle for the Iranian government. Iran’s foothold in Syria enables the mullahs in Tehran to pursue their reckless and violent regional policies — and its presence there must be ended.

  Ensuring that Iran is evicted from its regional hub in Damascus would cut off Iran’s access to its proxies (Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza) and visibly dent its domestic and international prestige, possibly forcing a hemorrhaging regime in Tehran to suspend its nuclear policies. This would be a safer and more rewarding option than the military one.

  As President Bashar al-Assad’s government falters, Syria is becoming Iran’s Achilles’ heel. Iran has poured a vast array of resources into the country. There are Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps encampments and Iranian weapons and advisers throughout Syria. And Iranian-controlled Hezbollah forces from Lebanon have joined in butchering the Syrians who have risen up against Mr. Assad. Iran is intent on assuring its hold over the country regardless of what happens to Mr. Assad — and Israel and the West must prevent this at all costs.

  Sadly, the opportunities presented by Syria’s meltdown seem to be eluding Israeli leaders. Last week, Israel’s military intelligence chief spoke of the 200,000 missiles and rockets in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria that could reach all of Israel’s population centers. And there is a growing risk that advanced Syrian weapons might fall into the hands of terrorist groups. Iran’s presence in Damascus is vital to maintaining these threats.

  At this stage, there is no turning back; Mr. Assad must step down. For Israel, the crucial question is not whether he falls but whether the Iranian presence in Syria will outlive his government. Getting Iran booted out of Syria is essential for Israel’s security. And if Mr. Assad goes, Iranian hegemony over Syria must go with him. Anything less would rob Mr. Assad’s departure of any significance.

  But Israel should not be the lone or even the principal actor in speeding his exit. Any workable outcome in Syria will have to involve the United States, Russia and Arab countries. America must offer Russia incentives to stop protecting the Assad regime, which will likely fall the moment Moscow withdraws its support. A force with a mandate from the Arab League should then ensure stability until a new Syrian government can take over.