Sunday, June 17, 2018

13 Angry Democrats. Who is Trump referring to?

  1.  33 minutes ago
    1. '13 Angry Democrats'. Who is Trump referring to? Maybe not who everyone assumes. Thoughts.
    Why didn’t the 13 Angry Democrats investigate the campaign of Crooked Hillary Clinton, many crimes, much Collusion with Russia? Why didn’t the FBI take the Server from the DNC? Rigged Investigation!
    12 replies138 retweets195 likes
     
     
     
  2.  33 minutes ago
    2. Trump has tweeted about this gang EIGHT times: May 7, then 26 (x2), 27, 29 & June 7 (x3). On each occassion, the tweets APPEAR to be referencing the Mueller SC team. That's what slave media tells us. One problem.
    1 reply17 retweets66 likes
     
     
     
  3.  32 minutes ago
    3. The Mueller SC team has AT LEAST 18 lawyers/investigators. AND Mueller is a Republican. Another thing.
    4 replies9 retweets56 likes
     
     
     
  4.  32 minutes ago
    4. If you examine Trump's tweets very closely (which is ESSENTIAL), he NEVER references Mueller at all. Here they are. Read them. Is there a DIRECT reference to Mueller? NO.
    1 reply13 retweets58 likes
     
     
     
  5.  31 minutes ago
    5. Now it IS true that at least 13 of Mueller's 18 are Democrats (likely 15). Trump may well be simply referring to them. And that's what I assumed, until the public's OIG Report was released. But then I read Page 89, footnote:
    3 replies16 retweets64 likes
     
     
     
6. 'FBI analysts and Prosecutor 2 told us that former President Barack Obama was one of the 13 individuals with whom Clinton had direct contact using her account.' 'THIRTEEN' individuals.
7:53 AM - 17 Jun 2018
7 replies57 retweets138 likes
 
 
 
Robby BallTweet text
 
 

    1. New conversation
    1.  29 minutes ago
      7. 'Thirteen Angry Democrats'. Seems too much of a coincidence. To me, at least. Don't you think?
      7 replies13 retweets97 likes
       
       
       
    2.  28 minutes ago
      8. We know that the OIG finding is clear evidence that Obama lied about this group & was anxious to keep his role concealed. Anyway, I took the time to re-read each preceding Trump tweet, with this new knowledge.
      1 reply16 retweets63 likes
       
       
       
    3.  28 minutes ago
      9. And it's quite amazing - each one could be referring to Obama's 13 Angry Democrats. There's no DIRECT reference to Mueller, except by the negative IQ MSM.
      3 replies13 retweets63 likes
       
       
       
    4.  26 minutes ago
      10. Then, June 15: Trump decides to walk out of the WH and do an impromptu presser with FOX (Reminder : Trump PLANNED to do this):
      1 reply7 retweets53 likes
       
       
       
    5.  25 minutes ago
      11. Again, he uses the '13 Angry Democrats' line, BUT he does NOT directly link it to Mueller. Just my POV, but I think Trump may have been referencing ANOTHER group of Democrats, the whole time. The one referenced on page 89 of the OIG Report. In the footnote.Tweet 6, above.
      2 replies13 retweets57 likes
       
       
       
    6.  25 minutes ago
      12. If true, I think he's doing it DELIBERATELY. He's sending a message to the '13 Angry Democrats': 'I'VE GOT YOUR NUMBER. I KNOW IT. YOU KNOW IT. AND YOU KNOW I KNOW IT.'
      4 replies23 retweets83 likes
       
       
       
    7.  24 minutes ago
      13. And 'I'm going to DESTROY you guys.' 'REAL SLOW.' It's classic Trump, if true. Vindictive revenge. And in this case, fully justified.
      2 replies18 retweets87 likes
       
       
       
    8.  24 minutes ago
      14. Imagine being Obama, Clinton, Lynch and the other 10 Angry Democrats. They KNOW they are screwed. They KNOW Trump will wait until the perfect moment to screw them, too. They KNOW Trump is playing with them, but no one can see it.
      5 replies31 retweets100 likes
       
       
       
    9.  23 minutes ago
      15. Imagine living that, 24/7. Utter powerlessness. A nightmare, with only one ending. Exposure, humiliation, punishment. Cruel? Maybe. But consider the incredible damage these people have done. And also, consider Trump's POV.
      3 replies14 retweets80 likes
       
       
       
    10.  23 minutes ago
      16. These SOBs were going to ruin him, destroy his family and piss on his grave. EVIL people. They'd do it to YOU, also. Feeling sympathetic now? NO. Me neither.
      2 replies22 retweets93 likes
       
       
       
    11.  22 minutes ago
      17. Trump is clever. I'm on record saying he's a genius. In the literal sense. His IQ is off the charts. Everything is calculated. People constantly fall for 'The Donald' caricature HE created. The extroverted, lazy, undisciplined buffoon.
      6 replies21 retweets92 likes
       
       
       
    12.  22 minutes ago
      18. In reality, Trump is the opposite. Highly introverted, thoughtful, pure energy, with iron discipline. And sharp as a tack. Dont believe me? Here's an early interview with him (he was 34):
      2 replies19 retweets86 likes
       
       
       
    13.  21 minutes ago
      19. That's the REAL guy. Or a glimpse. The actual Trump is essentially unknowable. Deliberately so. A deep well, that has no end. Down you go, if you like. Try to reach the bottom of the well. BUT you may go mad. There is no ending.
      1 reply10 retweets52 likes
       
       
       
    14.  20 minutes ago
      20. Trump 2018 uses 'The Donald' as a shield and a weapon, when it suits him. To DEVASTATING effect. As, I suspect, we are seeing right now.
      1 reply6 retweets48 likes
       
       
       
    15.  19 minutes ago
      21. As he plays with the '13 Angry Democrats.' Before he skewers them, just at the right moment. BUT : Trump MUST be talking about Mueller, right?
      4 replies8 retweets46 likes
       
       
       
    16.  17 minutes ago
      22. There's NO other possible explanation. Unless, of course, there IS. The end.
      9 replies20 retweets82 likes
       
       
       
      17. End of conversation
    1.  29 minutes ago
      Replying to 
      Whoa great catch Rex
      1 retweet2 likes
       
       
       
    1.  17 minutes ago
      Replying to 
      I NEVER watch MSM and I never even considered it was Mueller and co. I just wondered who they were. Where I saw the IG report I thought the answer was clear.
       
       
       
    1.  23 minutes ago
      Replying to 
      Sorry, , I have a question. Is this information about '13 people with whom Clinton had direct contact' appeared anywhere but in this ? If no, does it mean that Trump knew about this 'group' for long-long time, way before ?
       
       
       
    1.  25 seconds ago
      Replying to 
       
       
       
       
    1.  17 minutes ago
      Replying to 
      Thought the same
       
       
       
    1.  27 minutes ago
      Replying to 
      Bingo!!! We gonna get a Perp walk after all!!!!
       
       
       
Posted by rkball44 at 5:26 AM