Saturday, June 30, 2018

Why does Strzok have FBI lawyers

  1.  6 hours ago
    The most important question you asked is this: "Why does Strzok have FBI lawyers" Why were these FBI lawyers dictating what Strzok could say? The easy answer is to protect the FBI. This is wrong. The correct answer is to protect the Ongoing Investigations.
    Is Peter Strzok still on payroll? Has Peter Strzok been fired? Why does Strzok have FBI lawyers? Why are we paying his legal fees? Seriously.…
    28 replies296 retweets511 likes
     
     
     
  2.  4 hours ago
    Strzok already HAS his own attorney. Aitan Goelman
    3 replies25 retweets91 likes
     
     
     
  3.  4 hours ago
    Consider what IG noted on Strzok's bias re: Weiner & Russia Inv: "We did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop was free from bias."
    1 reply36 retweets123 likes
     
     
     
Ask yourself two questions: Why were Dems were so desperate to stop Rosenstein Hearing. Why were Dems demanding release of Strzok testimony.
9:15 AM - 30 Jun 2018
2 replies45 retweets133 likes
 
 
 
Robby BallTweet text
 
 

    1. New conversation
    1.  4 hours ago
      The Democrats were terrified of what Rosenstein (and possibly Wray) might say during their testimony. They were literally frightened. Interruptions and objections by Dems were frequent and intense.
      6 replies64 retweets183 likes
       
       
       
    2.  4 hours ago
      Interruptions and objections occurred before the start of the hearing. They continued throughout. Watch this Ratcliffe segment. Interruptions begin at 1:10 and continue for several minutes.
      5 replies49 retweets144 likes
       
       
       
    3.  4 hours ago
      They were concerned over exchanges like this one: I encourage you to watch the entirety.
      5 replies46 retweets123 likes
       
       
       
    4.  4 hours ago
      Rosenstein: I dispute your characterization of what that FISA is about.... ...I can tell you that the information that’s public about that doesn’t match with my understanding of the one that I signed.
      4 replies46 retweets135 likes
       
       
       
    5.  4 hours ago
      Rosenstein: I think it’s appropriate to let the Inspector General complete that investigation. These are serious allegations. I don’t do the investigations. I’m not the affiant.
      5 replies34 retweets128 likes
       
       
       
    6.  4 hours ago
      Those FISA documents were sworn to – under oath – and vetted by FBI Agents. Consider the ramifications if the FISA documents were falsified… Another possibility: The LEAKS regarding what’s in the FISA Application are false. Either way this was a big reveal.
      4 replies76 retweets191 likes
       
       
       
    7.  4 hours ago
      I don't think everything the Dems were afraid of came out in that hearing. Not by a long shot. But some of it - like the FISA Revelation - did.
      2 replies42 retweets156 likes
       
       
       
    8.  4 hours ago
      I found it quite interesting that Nunes followed up with this letter the next day. 17 names. Not everyone we want - but a good start. Note the political hierarchy cutoff - by intent.
      4 replies86 retweets192 likes
       
       
       
    9.  4 hours ago
      Strzok was on that list. Recall: Strzok was escorted out of the FBI Building on Friday June 15, 2018. Before his June 27, 2018 Congressional testimony.
      4 replies35 retweets109 likes
       
       
       
    10.  3 hours ago
      I don't believe Strzok's yet been fired. He will be at some point. But I do find it telling that Strzok has his own lawyer. Yet FBI lawyers brought him to Congressional testimony.
      3 replies21 retweets95 likes
       
       
       
    11.  3 hours ago
      I'm not convinced Rosenstein is a good guy. But he was under OATH in a VERY public setting. My own take echoes the one put forth by
      1. If Rosenstein (and Mueller) were part of a conspiracy to undermine the Trump Presidency, using the SC as a pretext, you can be sure that Trump, Sessions, Wray, Nunes, Horowitz and Huber would have known for some time.…
      Show this thread
      14 replies66 retweets165 likes
       
       
       
    12.  3 hours ago
      I think we are watching a very high stakes political theater. One in which all the players are NOT equally privy to information. I admire and like Jordan & Gaetz. But I don't think they know everything that Nunes, Goodlatte & Grassley do.
      7 replies49 retweets202 likes
       
       
       
    13.  3 hours ago
      Jordan & Gaetz had their role. And they played it well. Information that was supposed to come out did.
      2 replies28 retweets137 likes
       
       
       
    14.  3 hours ago
      Note that Gowdy asked NO questions. He simply delivered an emotional statement: Whatever you got finish it the hell up. Because this country is being torn apart.
      5 replies28 retweets140 likes
       
       
       
    15.  3 hours ago
      Gowdy probably knows as much as anyone. He was assigned by Nunes to view items even Nunes hasn't seen directly. So why didn't Gowdy ask questions. Why did he simply encourage everyone to hurry the hell up?
      6 replies24 retweets107 likes
       
       
       
    16.  3 hours ago
      Unfortunately, we are still some ways from the end that Gowdy is encouraging. There is at least one more IG Report - the FISA Abuse Report. There are probably several more beyond that. But this hearing cracked the door.
      6 replies39 retweets116 likes
       
       
       
    17.  3 hours ago
      This is not simply about White Hats or Black Hats. This is Washington DC - at best we are dealing in shades of grey. As someone else noted, this is about leverage.
      7 replies29 retweets126 likes
       
       
       
      18. End of conversation
    2. More replies
    1.  3 hours ago
      Replying to 
      Rosensteins confirmation vote was in the 90s..... dems did not obstruct at all on him
      1 retweet1 like
       
       
       
Posted by Robby Ball at 10:42 AM