Sunday, July 1, 2018

Who is Q? In the beginning, Q didn't sign as Q


(1) A thread on "Who is Q and other questions"
11:48 AM - 27 Apr 2018
52 replies262 retweets399 likes



Robby BallTweet text

    1. New conversation


    1.  Apr 27
      (2) First of all, please take note of this drop...
      18 replies65 retweets197 likes






    2.  Apr 27
      (3) ... and more especifically this part of it. Bear with me a bit.
      2 replies39 retweets147 likes






    3.  Apr 27
      (4) So, who is Q? People have all kinds of crazy ideas about it. But what can the drops tell us about it?
      4 replies28 retweets134 likes






    4.  Apr 27
      (5) First of all, the drops started the very day JK returned from a SECRET trip to SA. So, does he have anything to do with it? Perhaps.
      9 replies50 retweets159 likes






    5.  Apr 27
      (6) and also, let's give Dr. a break! It is not him, like has said a thousand times before! :)
      7 replies44 retweets181 likes






    6.  Apr 27
      (7) When I started following the Q drops back in late November, I held what seemed to be the standard explanation: it had to do with Q clearance, and U1 scandal etc. But no! That's not the explanation.

      5 replies48 retweets150 likes






    7.  Apr 27
      (8) So we come back to drop 144, and find the Q Group - The Directorate of Security and Counterintelligence of No Such Agency (NSA for begginers).
      2 replies62 retweets186 likes






    8.  Apr 27
      (9) Look closely, and we find that Q is a weapon for POTUS to change the narrative. An antidote to Mockingbird Media (MSM paid by the C!A for begginers).
      7 replies61 retweets222 likes






    9.  Apr 27
      (10) Look what Q group was doing back in 2013:
      8 replies61 retweets195 likes






    10.  Apr 27
      (11) Soon after the drops started in late October, this happened. A hack that was "bigger than Snowden" in terms of damage to National Security. What a coincidences! ;) Clowns KNOW the group is behind the drops.
      2 replies42 retweets163 likes






    11.  Apr 27
      (12) This is an excerpt from the NYT article that Q mentioned before. The NYT hides behind a paywall, so I had to "hack" the text from the article rather than do a screen-grab like I prefer to do.
      5 replies40 retweets161 likes






    12.  Apr 27
      (13) Here is a list of directorates for No Such Agency, and a breakdown of the structure of the ADS&CI (Directorate Q).

      2 replies45 retweets166 likes






    13.  Apr 27
      (14) So, that's it? NO. The content and style of the bulk of the publications is POTUS. That's pretty clear to me. In the beggning, Q didn't sign as "Q", and the first signature of drops we see is this: 4-10-20 - D.J.T.
      8 replies75 retweets255 likes






    14.  Apr 27
      (15) YES. The mysterious character is hidden in plain sight.

      1 reply45 retweets190 likes






    15.  Apr 27
      (16) The Q guys and girls agree. :)
      3 replies54 retweets216 likes






    16.  Apr 27
      (17) Boy, and did the Q group have to work to maintain safe communications for the project. Several times boards were compromised, and many cyber combats were fought along the way.
      1 reply34 retweets162 likes






    17.  Apr 27
      (18) Another cornerstone. What is the MAP, that holds all the many moving parts of together?
      3 replies32 retweets128 likes






    18.  Apr 27
      (19) I call your attention to this drop from right after the Hawaii nuke scare.
      4 replies56 retweets159 likes






    19.  Apr 27
      (20) This bit: the MAP was planned for 3 years. It's a plan. It was laboriously built for 3 years before POTUS even ran - OR - it was planned to take 3 years for completion - or both. :)
      7 replies90 retweets223 likes






    20.  Apr 27
      (21) Unlike other riddles and codes, this one is never openly explained, so I looked at military and security acronyms and got this: it's a MATER ACTION PLAN. It fits perfectly.
      10 replies59 retweets196 likes






    21.  Apr 27
      (22) It goes like this: MAP > KEY > TRUTH > LIGHT > HUMANITY SAVED.
      3 replies69 retweets198 likes






    22.  Apr 27
      (23) "Less than ten can confirm me." Q says. What? 👾 Let's take a look.
      5 replies31 retweets133 likes






    23.  Apr 27
      (24) Here's the deal: "You can count the people who have the full picture on two hands. Of those (less than 10 people) only three are non-military. Why is this relevant?"
      7 replies58 retweets178 likes






    24.  Apr 27
      (25) TOTAL COMPARTMENTALIZATION OF INFORMATION. "Game theory. Outside of a potential operator who has been dialed-in w/ orders (specific to his/her mission) nobody else has this information. Operators never divulge."
      2 replies35 retweets155 likes






    25.  Apr 27
      (26) If Q is giving forewarning of events, why was there no investigation on the drops? (Now, of course, there is one.) LESS THAN 10 - no leaks.
      3 replies38 retweets155 likes






    26.  Apr 27
      (27) The last riddle in today's thread is one that I argued endlessly with Patriots that have hunchesthat are not grounded in the Q drops. What is the keystone. Spoiler alert: it's NOT SES. It's not the Federal Reserve.
      7 replies33 retweets143 likes






    27.  Apr 27
      (28) This term is explained openly, no need for "decoding". KEY - INFORMATION. STONE - MILITARY FORCE TO IMPLEMENT THAT INFORMATION.
      9 replies58 retweets197 likes






    28.  Apr 27
      (29) And yet again: No Such Agency (Wizards and Warlocks) + POTUS and Military = APPLY THE KEYSTONE.
      5 replies56 retweets189 likes






    29.  Apr 27
      (30) So Q and less than 10 people know the MAP, and have the KEYSTONE to send us the drops, so we can bring the rain, and is upon us. /END.
      77 replies153 retweets433 likes



      30. End of conversation
    2. New conversation


    1.  Apr 27
      Replying to 
      Good ground work for Normies my friend. Don't stop.
      2 replies2 retweets14 likes






    2.  Apr 27
      Thanks a lot! I will not stop :)
      1 reply1 retweet11 likes






    3.  Apr 27
      WELL DONE PAUL
      1 reply1 retweet8 likes






    4.  Apr 27
      thanks a lot! :D
      1 reply7 likes






    5.  Apr 27
      Excellent breakdown Paul. Thank you
      1 reply6 likes






    6.  Apr 27
      I appreciate the support! :)
      6 likes



      7. End of conversation
    3. New conversation


    1.  Apr 27
      Replying to 
      Paul, I watched the movie yesterday about ES, and he was repeatedly referred to as SW. Do you think ES is one of ten? Or is ES an enemy? This was not clear to me.
      2 replies3 likes






    2.  Apr 27
      No. But that is the reason they call him Snow White in the drops. I had to debate endlessly with peopleinsisting that the mention was to one of C_A's supercomputers. hahaha I think he has been co-opted by the administration.



Posted by Robby Ball at 10:42 AM