Saturday, May 26, 2018

More stuff that Sessions/Horowitz/Huber have known for almost a year can now be made public

  1.  58 minutes ago
    More stuff that Sessions/Horowitz/Huber have known for almost a year can now be made public by letting this guy testify to Congress, so they may now know it too:
    12 replies258 retweets443 likes
     
     
     
  2.  53 minutes ago
    Of course, what most media people haven't figured out yet, is that this is headed straight towards both Pientka's and Strzok's 302 interview forms being changed after the fact to justify a criminal charge of perjury being made against General Flynn.
    4 replies88 retweets206 likes
     
     
     
  3.  50 minutes ago
    At some point in his interview, I'm sure alluded to the fact his phone calls with Kislyak were monitored & recorded & TRANSCRIPTS of the conversations were part of that selfsame intelligence report that were leaked to Ignatius of the Washington Post.
    3 replies47 retweets124 likes
     
     
     
  4.  49 minutes ago
    That has been kept strictly under wraps by the media until now, because the narrative started by Ignatius in WaPo was that NOBODY knew exactly what Flynn & Kislyak said to each other & this was precisely WHY Flynn needed to be investigated by the FBI.
    5 replies47 retweets124 likes
     
     
     
  5.  48 minutes ago
    In fact, here's a quick summary of events: 1) somebody leaks parts of a classified intelligence report to Ignatius about Flynn calling Kislyak several times in December 2016. 2) that leaker VERY CAREFULLY AVOIDS mentioning transcripts of the actual conversations exist
    4 replies51 retweets130 likes
     
     
     
  6.  46 minutes ago
    3) Ignatius is used willingly to get a narrative started: 'OMG FLYNN CALLED THE RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR, THEY TALKED ABOUT OBAMA'S NEW SANCTIONS AGAINST RUSSIA BUT *NOBODY KNOWS* HOW IT WAS DISCUSSED! This Flynn guy needs to be investigated because hey LOGAN ACT & stuff!"
    3 replies39 retweets119 likes
     
     
     
  7.  45 minutes ago
    8 replies30 retweets94 likes
     
     
     
  8.  43 minutes ago
    4) Ignatius' planted story based on a leak done is such a careful way so as to place Flynn under suspicion of having committed a crime appeared on January 12th, the day after Buzzfeed ran the entire Steele Dossier.
    6 replies39 retweets95 likes
     
     
     
  9.  41 minutes ago
    5) Having placed Flynn under suspicion with a carefully crafted strategic leak, the FBI's 7th floor then dispatches 2 agents to interview Flynn about Ignatius' story & get him on the record about these phone calls with Kislyak from late December.
    5 replies38 retweets93 likes
     
     
     
  10.  39 minutes ago
    6) The two FBI agents dispatched to interview Flynn about the phone calls are Joe Pientka and Peter Strzok. They interview Flynn & according to multiple sources, INCLUDING JAMES COMEY & ANDREW MCCABE testifying to Congressional oversight committees, Flynn didn't appear to lie.
    3 replies39 retweets98 likes
     
     
     
  11.  34 minutes ago
    7) Skip forward from the day of the interview, January 24th, 2017, to late October of that year. Mueller makes his first indictments, and when they are unsealed, it's revealed that Gen. Flynn has been indicted for PERJURY for lying during his interview about the Kislyak calls.
    4 replies37 retweets84 likes
     
     
     
  12.  32 minutes ago
    8) On Dec. 1, before presiding Judge Ruldolph Contreras, Flynn pleaded guilty to the charge of lying to both Strzok & Pientka during his interview about the Kislyak phone calls, calls for WHICH TRANSCRIPTS EXIST, which Flynn is fully aware of. How does Flynn know this?
    6 replies34 retweets78 likes
     
     
     
  13.  27 minutes ago
    9) Well that's easy. It was reported at the time and never mentioned by the media again, so people quickly forgot about. But I'm not most people & don't forget so here it is: look at the date.
    7 replies44 retweets94 likes
     
     
     
  14.  25 minutes ago
    Look at the very first line in the news story: "The FBI in late December *reviewed intercepts* of communications between the Russian ambassador to the United States and retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn..." Wait, what's that? Intercepts, you say? 🤔
    2 replies46 retweets96 likes
     
     
     
  15.  22 minutes ago
    10) So try to grasp this: Michael Flynn just pleaded guilty for lying to 2 FBI agents about what he said to Kislyak during phone calls which were INTERCEPTED & transcribed, where the FBI had originally reviewed those transcripts and then CLEARED HIM OF HAVING DONE ANYTHING WRONG.
    7 replies40 retweets94 likes
     
     
     
  16.  20 minutes ago
    11) What happens immediately AFTER Flynn enters this guilty plea on Dec. 1? First, the presiding Judge. Ruldoph Contreras, is suddenly removed from the case. The media insists on reporting that he recused HIMSELF, which is not the case. Somebody YANKED him.
    5 replies44 retweets93 likes
     
     
     
  17.  17 minutes ago
    Judge Rudolph Contreras was unceremoniously yanked off the case AFTER the plea had been entered. He was replaced by Judge Emmet Sullivan, who has a long history of going after Fed. prosecutors for Brady violations. Brady violations = prosecutors HIDE exculpatory evidence.
    5 replies36 retweets70 likes
     
     
     
  18.  14 minutes ago
    12) The next thing that happens is that the first batch of Peter Strzok/Lisa Page text messages get released to the media after THIS guy gives them to Congress:
    2 replies25 retweets55 likes
     
     
     
  19.  12 minutes ago
    13) The next thing that happens is that both James Comey and Andrew McCabe are asked about Flynn's Jan. 24, 2017 interview while testifying before Congressional oversight committees. Both men go on the record saying the interviewing FBI agents didn't think Flynn was lying.
    1 reply14 retweets38 likes
     
     
     
  20.  11 minutes ago
    14) After all the evidence starts to come out, suddenly McCabe & Comey REVERSE COURSE & claim Flynn did lie during the interview. Comey especially has been going around claiming he was 'misunderstood' about this.
    2 replies16 retweets33 likes
     
     
     
  21.  9 minutes ago
    15) There is something that can settle the matter. After ever official interview, FBI agents fill out an interview form, which is a LEGAL RECORD, it's called the FD-302. Both Strzok & Pientka would've filed a FD-302 following the interview with Flynn.
    1 reply18 retweets42 likes
     
     
     
  22.  7 minutes ago
    16) Here's where it gets interesting: once the 302 forms are looked at, & they say Flynn wasn't deceptive OR the agent who filed that form now says it's been CHANGED since he filed it to now say he saw Flynn lying, it's game over for the Flynn prosecution.
    1 reply14 retweets33 likes
     
     
     
  23.  6 minutes ago
    17) You can bet BOTH Pientka & Strzok are eventually going to testify to Congress under oath, just as they have been by Horowitz & John Huber in recent months, & they are going to be presented with their 302 forms from that interview & asked about it.
    1 reply11 retweets26 likes
     
     
     
18) Because here's what I suspect happened: both agents after the interview stated to superiors Flynn was not deceptive, & filed 302 forms to that effect. And then SOMEBODY higher up decided make use of this interview to nail Flynn for a bogus crime.
8:22 PM - 26 May 2018
2 replies13 retweets21 likes
 
 
 
Robby BallTweet text
 
 

    1. New conversation
    1.  3 minutes ago
      19) And one of the first things they'd have to do in order to make a frame of Flynn work is get at least 1 of the agents on board with the frame & talk him into altering his 302 form in order to file a perjury charge.
      2 replies5 retweets8 likes
       
       
       
    2.  1 minute ago
      20) But the problem here is that there were TWO agents at the interview, and it's very likely 1 of them, Pientka, didn't go along with the plot. It could also be Strzok has been flipped by Horowitz/Huber & states his 302 form says Flynn didn't lie, or he ALTERED IT LATER.
      1 reply8 likes
       
       
       
    3.  22 seconds ago
      21) Now Senator Chuck Grassley is requesting to have FBI agent Joe Pientka made available for an on-the-record, transcribed interview where you can be sure he's going to be asked at length about this Jan. 24th interview of Michael Flynn.
       
       
       
      4. End of conversation
    1.  24 seconds ago
      Replying to 
      Wouldn't Mueller have questioned those agents rather than just going off of the 302's?
       
       
       
Posted by rkball44 at 5:34 PM