Saturday, June 2, 2018

Papadopoulos may be part of the Obama/Clinton gang

    1.  2 hours ago
      1. I'm now convinced that Papadopoulos may be part of the Obama/Clinton gang & that his 'plea deal' with the Special Counsel, is as dodgy as hell. Here's why.
      My weekend column: The Papadopoulos Case Needs a Closer Look
      24 replies300 retweets396 likes
       
       
       
    2.  2 hours ago
      2. Since Sep/Oct 2017, I've been persuaded that Papadopoulos (GP) was an EXTREMELY suspicious character & NOT the naive stooge he's being painted as today. If twitter hadn't erased all my threads arguing my case, I'd link one. But they have.
      5 replies47 retweets149 likes
       
       
       
    3.  2 hours ago
      3. Anyway, just consider. How did GP get on Team Trump? He was loitering around the Ben Carson campaign, before he drifted into Team Trump, working for nothing. He approached them. Not vice versa.
      2 replies53 retweets149 likes
       
       
       
    4.  2 hours ago
      4. Note again: GP was with Ben Carson, leaving only when it was clear Carson's run was over. It's likely Obama was ALSO spying on Carson. And Cruz, Kasich and Rubio - oh and Sanders, BTW. I'd LOVE to know how GP approached Carson.
      5 replies60 retweets174 likes
       
       
       
    5.  2 hours ago
      5. OK, next question. What did GP do when on Team Trump? His primary concern on Team Trump seemed to be setting up meetings with Russians, or emailing others that he could. GP wasn't asked to do this, he was suggesting it. He was voluntarily proposing the idea to them.
      3 replies57 retweets160 likes
       
       
       
    6.  2 hours ago
      6. And what did he do BEFORE he joined Team Trump? We have a series of meetings in Europe, BEFORE GP joined the campaign. With Mifsud. Millian. God knows who else. And something else that's highly suspicious.
      1 reply46 retweets145 likes
       
       
       
    7.  2 hours ago
      7. GP NEVER disclosed these meetings to Team Trump. If he had, they would have booted him back out the door. Which he knew full well. Oh. Did GP disclose his prior employment at Hillary Clinton's State Department? Almost certainly not. Should he have?
      3 replies68 retweets167 likes
       
       
       
    8.  2 hours ago
      8. OF COURSE HE SHOULD HAVE. She was the opponent! It was a Presidential campaign, for crying out loud. They'd tell him to get lost. He disclosed nothing. In fact, he concealed it all.
      4 replies46 retweets145 likes
       
       
       
    9.  2 hours ago
      9. Back to Mifsud. Consider this : we now know that GP was aware he was joining the campaign in early March. But he didn't join the Trump campaign until 21 March, 2016. He met Mifsud on 14 March.
      2 replies43 retweets124 likes
       
       
       
    10.  1 hour ago
      10. GP knew and met Mifsud a week BEFORE he joined the Trump campaign. But told no one. Yes, you DID read that right. Look, GP may be innocent in all this. But here's what I think.
      2 replies49 retweets125 likes
       
       
       
    11.  1 hour ago
      11. Mueller's SC has MUZZLED Papadopoulos, because THEY know he was a SPY inside Trump's campaign team, tasked to set up meetings, as part of an effort to frame Trump. Under the terms of the deal, he can't talk to anyone. Why do I think that?
      7 replies56 retweets148 likes
       
       
       
    12.  1 hour ago
      12. It's always worth going back and reading primary sources, as new events and information comes to light. Check out the 'plea deal' GP signed with Mueller's SC, Oct 5, 2017.
                  1.  
    13.  1 hour ago
      13. We NOW know that Mifsud was primarily aligned with WESTERN intel, specifically UK/MI6. NOT Russian. But the plea deal says this:
      1 reply37 retweets111 likes
       
       
       
    14.  1 hour ago
      14. '(Papadopoulos) understood that the professor had substantial connections to Russian government officials (and had met with some of those officials in Moscow immediately prior to telling [him] about the “thousands of emails”) /...
      1 reply30 retweets102 likes
       
       
       
    15.  1 hour ago
      15. /..and, over a period of months, [he] repeatedly sought to use the professor’s Russian connections in an effort to arrange a meeting between the Campaign and Russian government officials.' WTF?
      2 replies41 retweets112 likes
       
       
       
    16.  1 hour ago
      16. Sounds like someone is putting words into GPs mouth. Also, note: They're DELIBERATELY portraying Mifsud as a Russian agent, with NO evidence that he was. Because there is NO evidence, even today. REX 'BS-O-Meter': 100%. This stinks to high heaven.
      1 reply40 retweets130 likes
       
       
       
    17.  1 hour ago
      17. Another odd thing about this plea deal. Remember that Papadopoulos pled guilty to 'lying to the FBI' in an interview. When was the interview between GP & the FBI? JANUARY 27, 2017. Just 3 DAYS AFTER the interview with the FBI. Coincidence? I think NOT.
      2 replies49 retweets114 likes
       
       
       
    18.  1 hour ago
      18. Who wants a bet that Peter Strzok was one of the interviewers? And that 'Andy' McCabe was somehow involved. How I'd love to know, as well as to read the 302s. Now of course, I could be wrong. But let's assume I am right, for argument's sales.
      3 replies31 retweets102 likes
       
       
       
    19.  1 hour ago
      19. What's Robert Mueller's involvement in this? We don't know. Mueller didn't sign the plea deal, which is interesting. Obama/Clinton thugs have, however: Jennie Rhee, Andrew Goldstein & Aaron Zelinsky.
      4 replies35 retweets96 likes
       
       
       
    20.  1 hour ago
      20. Signed in early October, 2017. As you know, I think that Mueller's SC has been a target of Horowitz since at least July, 2017. IMO the OIG has special agents all over Mueller. If so, they'd be aware of everything that happened.
      3 replies36 retweets97 likes
       
       
       
    21.  1 hour ago
      21. Who knows if Mueller is in on it? If so, he's in VERY hot water. Maybe off to jail for a long time. Unless, of course, he 'forgot' to tell the team they were being watched and he's letting his partisan hacks hang themselves, on their own petards.
      6 replies38 retweets105 likes
       
       
       
    22.  1 hour ago
      22. We will know, soon enough. But the momentum very much favors the truth right now. Protecting players in Obama & Clintons scheme, is heading in the opposite direction.
      2 replies35 retweets102 likes
       
       
       
    23. As for GP, the truth will emerge eventually. Don't be surprised to learn he was one of the spies inside Trump's campaign team. And how do we know that there WERE spies on the inside?
    8:47 PM - 2 Jun 2018
    4 replies37 retweets104 likes
     
     
     
    Robby BallTweet text
     
     

      1.  1 hour ago
        24. POTUS Trump has told us there were, repeatedly: The end.
        Reports are there was indeed at least one FBI representative implanted, for political purposes, into my campaign for president. It took place very early on, and long before the phony Russia Hoax became a “hot” Fake News story. If true - all time biggest political scandal!
        25 replies59 retweets157 likes
         
         
         
      1.  16 minutes ago
        Replying to  
        And why oh why with these spies and FISA warrants are they still looking for evidence? If they couldn’t find any with all the inside intel trying to manufacture & entrap hiis people during the campaign, there isn’t any.
        1 retweet
         
         
         
      1.  1 hour ago
        Replying to 
        Perhaps this what the documents that Nunes wants to see will reveal and why the DOJ is fighting so hard to keep them secret.
        1 retweet1 like
         
         
         
      4. More replies
      1.  1 hour ago
        Replying to 
        I think there were at least 3. Page PapaD and Manafort
Posted by rkball44 at 6:56 PM