Definition 6 Professional Services

<a href="http://proserve.definition6.com/"> Definition 6 Professional Services </a>
One stop for web development, hosting, and cloud migration Just ask for Jesse.

Thursday, May 17, 2012

50 years since a candidate has won the White House without carrying at least two of the three swing states of #Ohio, #Florida and #Pennsylvania

Melanie Jones

12:43 PM  -  Public
Bye Bye #Obama We the people, are sick of your sh*t!!!! #noobama2012
3
+4
James Hamel12:44 PM
that damn twisted leprechaun in the upper right frame, standing over his left shoulder.
Add a comment...Reply to Author

Robby Ball

12:20 PM  -  
+1'd on egyptday1.blogspot.com
  -  Public
#May17: Florida #Obama 44% leads Romney 43% »
WASHINGTON -- It's been more than 50 years since a candidate has won the White House without carrying at least two of the three swing states of Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania, and a new poll shows...
Robby Ball's profile photo
+3
Add a comment...Reply to Author

Robby Ball

12:08 PM  -  
+1'd on egyptday1.blogspot.com
  -  Public
#May17: North Carolina #Obama 43% #Romney 51% »
Mitt Romney has moved out to an eight-point lead over President Obama in North Carolina after the two men were virtually tied a month ago. The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voter...
Add a comment...Reply to Author
Your post has been deleted. Dismiss
Your post has been deleted. Dismiss
Your post has been deleted. Dismiss
h/t +Alan Lovejoy Great post! A BIG KUDOS to Judge Katherine Forrest for siding with the TRUTH! A Must read and Be Amaze of how the DOJ defend the#NDAA

Think about your children's FUTURE NOT yourself!!! #PartyMindedPeople

Excerpt from the article:

The Government was unable to define precisely what ”direct” or “substantial” “support” means. . . .Thus, an individual could run the risk of substantially supporting or directly supporting an associated force without even being aware that he or she was doing so.

The court also decisively rejected the argument that President Obama’s signing statement – expressing limits on how he intends to exercise the NDAA’s detention powers — solves any of these problems. That’s because, said the court, the signing statement “does not state that § 1021 of the NDAA will not be applied to otherwise-protected First Amendment speech nor does it give concrete definitions to the vague terms used in the statute.”

WOW! After all the Lies and Broken promises which you can see on these videos below: #TwinPartyDictatorship #EndTheLies

Barack Obama: Public Will Have 5 Days To Look At Every Bill That Lands On my Desk http://youtu.be/o5t8GdxFYBU

No Transparency in Obama White House http://youtu.be/gmKdbAgp2H8

Obama's broken promises kick-off campaign for 2012http://youtu.be/_hsquKMi5Ec
How can someone trust #Obama ? A BIG WOW! #HumanMindNOTPartyMind

3rd World Peeps of A 3 cents “Where TRUTH Matters because WE are all Human Beings.”

Scrutinize the candidates BEFORE/AFTER Election. Why? It’s because WE are a Human Being! IT’S PAYBACK TIME!!!

Please remember that out of 535 elected officials in Congress, there’s only a HANDFUL or LESS that’s been serving for the best interest of the majority of the people!!! How PITIFUL is that? IT’S PAYBACK TIME!!!

#ShoutOfThePeople #RonPaulRevolution #SpeaksTheTruth
#WeThePeople #UnchainedUs #LegalizeFreedom
Alan Lovejoy originally shared this post:
Federal court enjoins NDAA »
An Obama-appointed judge rules its indefinite detention provisions likely violate the 1st and 5th Amendments
2
+1
Add a comment...

No comments:

Flag Counter

Find all my socialmedia sites Here....

Find all my socialmedia sites Here....